Libya Update: The Violence of An Unraveling Regime [On Qaddafi's Speech]

[Libyan demonstrators destroying a representation of al-Qaddafis` Green Book. Image from BBC.] [Libyan demonstrators destroying a representation of al-Qaddafis` Green Book. Image from BBC.]

Libya Update: The Violence of An Unraveling Regime [On Qaddafi's Speech]

By : Ziad Abu-Rish زياد ابوالريش

On Sunday night, Saif al-Islam al-Qaddafi—son of Libyan "leader" Colonel Mu’ammar al-Qaddafi—gave a televised speech in which he denied the existence of genuine grievances and protests for regime change in Libya, attributing the last six days of social unrest to both foreign interference as well as “drunken and drugged out” elements of society. The protests, which began in Benghazi in the eastern part of the country, have spread to all major urban and rural areas, including the capital city of Tripoli in the western part of the country. Typical of most existing and former authoritarian regimes in the Arab world, Saif al-Islam claimed that without the regime Libya would be thrown into chaos—all varieties of it (an Islamist takeover, a civil war between the resource-rich eastern and population-dense western provinces, and the return of colonialism). He proceeded to assert the resolve of the regime to withstand all attempts to “undermine the state of Libya” threatening that “now is the time” to use violence in all its forms, including the armed forces, armed civilians, and the revolutionary committees. Saif al-Islam ended his speech with what appeared to be a dare directed at the Libyan people. He claimed that thousands of protesters represented very little of the 5-6 million inhabitants of Libya.

Today, the day after his speech, over a million protesters gathered in Tripoli defying the regime’s representations both in terms of numbers (with fifteen to twenty percent of the population turning out) and in terms of location (the capital city which is located in the western part of the country). The courage and persistence of protesters in the face of Saif al-Islam threats is humbling considering that 233 deaths and thousands of injuries had been confirmed as of the end of the day on Sunday (the night he gave his speech). These were the result of a variety tactics including the deployment of the police, army, and hired mercenaries.

What is horrifying about the present situation in Libya is that the “chaos card” is no longer a threat nor is it a strategy of maintaining power; it is the regime’s revenge for already becoming unraveled. Al-Jazeera quotes Libyan military officers who defected reporting Qaddafi claiming: "I was the one who created Libya, and I will be the one to destroy it." Media reports confirm the defection of various regime elements, including ambassadors to India, the UK, the Arab League, and the United Nations as well as two defecting pilots who landed two fighter jets in Malta instead of following orders to attack protesters.

Despite the unmistakable signs of the fall of the regime, the severity of the situation seems only to be escalating. Confirmed reports describe shoot-to-kill policies in certain parts of the country as well as the use of helicopter gun ships, fighter jets, and other artillery to inflict mass violence. The death toll today, Monday February 21st, alone is currently at 250 with several thousands injured. One of the greatest difficulties in understanding what exactly is happening in Libya is the relative media blackout enforced by al-Qaddafi`s regime, who disabled internet service across the country and disconnected phone service in many parts. Reports have also confirmed the jamming of satellite signals for several news stations, including al-Jazeera, al-Manar, NBN, and New TV. Beyond the fact of the unraveling of a 42-year old authoritarian regime at the hands of a popular uprising and the regime’s massacring of the Libyan people, it is difficult to analyze the situation on the ground. However, there should be no lack of clarity as to both the legitimate aspirations and humbling courage of the Libyan people, as well as the blood that is on the hands of the Libyan regime. The complicity--by virtue of silence--of the broader community of state leaders and international institutions is equally clear.

Below begins an ongoing list of updates on the situation in Libya.

Monday February 21

[10:55pm Beirut / 3:55pm New York]

Al-Jazeera reports that several cities are being shelled by tanks and jets.

Al-Jazeera reports that two more pilots refused to follow orders for air strikes and have landed in Benghazi.

[11:06pm Beirut / 4:06pm New York]

In a live interview with Al-Jazeera, Head of the Libyan Diplomatic Mission to the United Nations says that he "can in no way accept the shelling of the Libyan people." In response to being asked about who he is representing at the UN, the head of the mission replies that he "currently represents the will of the Libyan people until the situation ends."

[11:22pm Beirut / 4:22pm New York] 

Al-Jazeera reports that Libyan authorities have cut off all communication services in the country.

[11:52pm Beirut / 4:52 New York]

Al-Jazeera reports that the Libyan Diplomatic Mission to the United Nations has released a statement calling on al-Qaddafi to resign.

Libyan state television announced that Saif al-Islam al-Qaddafi is forming a committee to "investigate the incidents of the past few days."

Al-Jazeera reports that Saif al-Islam al-Qaddafi admitted to ordering air strikes on Triploi and Benghazi and that he claims to have only targeted ammunition storage.

[12:08am Beirut / 5:08pm New York]

Libyan Deputy Foreign Minister Khalid Ka`im is live on Al-Jazeera and denies that there was a massacre of civilians in Benghazi. He is also denying the existence of "African mercenaries" and shelling anywhere in Libya and said: "I trust any foreign news channels more than all the Arab news channels." He rejects any calls for al-Jazeera to send a crew to Libya with guarantees of protection. He claims that that Al-Jazeera is fabricating its stories.

An Egyptian television station claims that al-Qaddafi will make a television appearance soon.

[12:18am Beirut / 5:18pm New York]

U.S. Secretary of State Hilary Clinton states that it was "time to stop this unacceptable bloodshed" in Libya.

[12:24am Beirut / 5:24pm New York]

Khalid Ka`im (Libyan Foreign Ministry) is accusing Al-Jazeera of being a Qatari Zionist project and that the station`s agenda is clear. In response to a question about the possibility of al-Qaddafi addressing the Libyan people, Ka`im says he is awaiting information.

[12:34am Beirut / 5:34pm New York]

Al-Arabiya reports that al-Qaddafi will make a public address soon.

[12:43am Beirut / 5:43pm New York]

Al-Jazeera reports that  a group of Libyan military officers released a statement calling on all members of the army to join the people.

[1:39am Beirut / 6:39pm New York]

Libyan state television announced that al-Qaddafi will give a speech shortly.

[1:47am Beirut / 6:47pm New York]

Libyan state television now says it will broadcast a live interview with al-Qaddafi shortly.

[2:02am Beirut / 7:02pm New York]

Al-Jazeera reports that Libya`s Deputy Ambassador to the United Nations calls for a no-fly zone to be established over Libya.

U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is "outraged" at reports of air strikes on demonstrators and says such attacks "would constitute" a violation of international humanitarian law. As if everything before the use of air strikes was not outrageous and not in violation of international law!

[2:08am Beirut / 7:08pm New York]

Libyan state television just broadcast allegedly live images and sounds of al-Qadddafi standing near a military jeep, holding an umbrella, and claiming to still be in Libya and not in Venezuela (in reference to earlier unconfirmed reports). al-Qaddafi stated that the rain prevented what he had hoped would be a meeting with some "shabbab" in the Green Square in Tripoli. The scene was no more than 10 seconds and was apparently meant to prove his continued presence in Libya. Though clearly, assuming it was live and in Libya, it is not safe for him to be in any sort of public presence.

[2:49am Beirut / 7:49pm New York]

Al-Jazeera reports that Qatar`s Prime Minister (also Foreign Minister) called for an extraordinary meeting of the Arab League to discuss developments in Libya.

Al-Jazeera is also now able to confirm earlier reports that the Libyan Justice Minister Mustafa Abdul-Jalil had resigned earlier today and joined the protesters.

[4:20am Beirut / 9:20pm New York]

It would seem like now would be a juncture at which closing this post would make sense. Al-Jazeera is broadcasting an unrelated documentary while other channels have relapsed into their "regular programming." But the people of Libya continue to face the reality of the following through on what was an implicit promise of "we will kill you" (on the part of Saif al-Islam al-Qaddafi). As I type these words, I can`t help but think back to the calls from those on the ground in Libya that were aired live throughout the day on al-Jazeera and other stations. Whomever was speaking conveyed a sense of despiration and fear at what they were experiencing as well as a sense of horror and shock at the silence of "world leaders." As one Jadaliyya co-editor put it: "again, we will witness eleventh hour humanitarian/democratic support by many western powers regarding another Arab revolt."  Now is not the time to analyze the different reasons behind the silence on the part of governments in the United States, Europe, and the Middle East, as well as various international organizations. Despite their fear, despiration, horror, and shock, the Libyan people continued to turn out in larger numbers throughout the day. What is certain is that Qaddafi`s regime is on the brink of a total collapse in the face of unwavering demonstrators and various defecting elements. Unclear is the amount of death, injuries, and trauma that will accompany the final end of this regime. As of writing this conclusion, the unconfirmed total deaths is well over 600 and nearly ten thousand injured as the seventh day of the Libyan uprising has come to a close.

Tuesday February 22

[5:20pm Beirut / 10:20am New York]

Al-Arabiya reports that al-Qaddafi will give a speech soon in which he outlines major reforms. It also reports that he will declare that he remains in control of Tripoli. 

Reuters reports that several cities continue to be shelled by tanks and jets.

Reuters reports that Libya`s ambassador to the United State says: "I resign from serving the current dictatorship regime. But I will never resign from serving our people until their voices reach the whole world, until goals are achieved."

Reuters reports that al-Qaddafi`s regime is no longer in control of the border crossing between Libya and Egypt.

[5:30pm Beirut / 10:30am New York]

Al-Arabiya reports that al-Qaddafi will announce localized rule/governance instead of resigning.

Senator John Kerry calls on the Obama Administration to reimpose sanctions on Libya.

[5:42pm Beirut / 10:42am New York]

Several hours ago, Al-Jazeera English reported that the International Coalition Against War Criminals, a coalition of non-profit organizations formed in 2009 to focus on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, has reported 519 deaths, 3,980 wounded, and at least 1,500 missing Libya since the start of demonstrations last week.

[5:52pm Beirut / 10:52am New York]

Al-Qaddafi is speaking now.

He begins as if addressing a crowd in the Green Square and thanking them for presenting the truth as opposed to the "treacherous", "cowardly", and "reactionary" people that are trying to slander the image of Libya in the world. He goes on to say: "al-Qaddafi does not have a position to resign from like other Arab leaders." He claims to be the "leader of the revolution." Obviously not in reference to the existing revolt taking place. Al-Qaddafi is giving his speech in front of a partially destroyed building. He claims it is the home in Tripoli that was bombed as part of a US air strikes (on April 14 1986). 

He is claiming that a small group of young men "taking pills [i.e., drugs]" are taking advantage of the safety and security of Libya and attacking police stations and court offices to destroy their criminal records. He goes on to say that its not their fault because they are young ("only eighteen or nineteen years old"). He is saying the real problem is the very small group of people that are providing these young men with "pills." At one point, he accuses Tunisians and Egyptians of distributing said drugs.

He is justifying his hold on power by reference to the alleged glories he has brought to Libya including the revolution that "defeated reactionary and colonial forces."

At one point, he says: "Benghazi, who are you? These are not the people of Benghazi!" Clearly in reference to the fact that most reports indicate that Benghazi is no longer under the control of the regime despite continued state violence.

He announces localized rule/governance for each of the provinces. He calls for people to gather their children and come out in full force tomorrow to show their support for him and Libya. He reiterates that he does not have a position to resign from and that he is the "leader of the revolution."

Al-Qaddafi says: "All I have is my rifle." He follows this up by claiming that he has not yet resorted to force but that he will resort to it beginning tomorrow. He then reads from the what is meant to be the Green Book, reciting different "crimes" punishable by execution and proceeds to list "bearing arms against the state", "cooperating with foreign enemies", and "causing civil war." He started referring to these laws directly after threatening to "cleanse" the country of all elements that are causing unrest. 

Al-Qaddafi moves from talking about punishment by death to saying: "Bullets are nothing. When I order the use of force I burn everything."

He seems to be oscillating between calling the people to form local defense committees to fight "the rats" and warning the population against civil war, independent emirates, and/or an Afghanistan in North Africa that is under the control of Bin Laden and the United States.

After twenty minutes of nonsensical ramblings, the broadcast of his speech ended abruptly. But it was resumed with some serious threats, not that such threats haven`t already been a part of his ongoing speech.

Al-Qaddafi ended his speech by threatening a "sacred march" to cleanse the country of the unrest. His final words were: "Now is the hour of action. Now is the hour of marching. Now is the hour of victory. Onward . . . onward. Revolution . . . revolution."

[7:15pm Beirut / 12:15pm New York]

Analyses of al-Qaddafi`s speech are about to flood media outlets. While it is tempting to dismiss much of his speech as a crazy and endless rant, there should be no mistake about the threats he was making. Throughout his speech he repeatedly called on men and women to go out and bring their kids home. He also repeatedly threatened that starting tomorrow there will be clear orders to implement the law (i.e., executions) in all cities, neighborhoods, alleys. While his regime is obviously unraveling in the face of ongoing popular protests and official defections, al-Qaddafi remains able to continue inflicting the violence of the past week and probably can escalate it. He has effectively made clear that he will not leave with out unleashing the maximum amount of violence his capabilities (whatever they are) will allow him.

 

[For an analysis of Libya`s internal dynamics, click here for a Jadaliyya interview with Professor Ali Ahmida]

[For an analysis of eleventh hour intervention on the part of Western and Arab powers, click here.]


  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • تقرير أولي من بيروت: انفجار المرفأ وأصداؤه

      تقرير أولي من بيروت: انفجار المرفأ وأصداؤه

      لم تتضح بعد طبيعة الانفجار الذي حصل يوم الثلاثاء في مرفأ بيروت ومدى الأضرار التي سببها في أنحاء المدينة. هناك العديد من التقارير غير المؤكدة ومن الصعب اعتماد التصريحات الرسمية بسبب افتقارها للشفافية.

    • Preliminary Report from Beirut: Port Explosion and Its Reverberations

      Preliminary Report from Beirut: Port Explosion and Its Reverberations

      The nature of Tuesday’s explosion in the port of Beirut and the extent of the damage across the city and beyond is not yet clear. There are plenty of unconfirmed reports and it is hard to take official statements as transparent. That being said, the effects of the explosion were felt across the city and beyond.

    • Municipal Politics in Lebanon

      Municipal Politics in Lebanon
      The municipal system has been a key pillar of debates on administrative decentralization, economic development and political participation in Lebanon. During the late 1990s and early 2000s, activists

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412